How Dark Matter Could Take Us To The Stars

The hyperdrive from Star Wars appears to depict an ultra-relativistic motion through space, extremely close to the speed of light. Under the...


The hyperdrive from Star Wars appears to depict an ultra-relativistic motion through space, extremely close to the speed of light. Under the laws of relativity, you neither reach nor exceed the speed of light if you re made of matter. But you might be able to approach it if you had a large-enough amount of an efficient-enough fuel. Dark matter could fit exactly the conditions we need to make this science-fiction dream a reality.





Jedimentat





Dark matter is one of the biggest mysteries in all of modern science. Everywhere we look on large cosmic scales — from low-mass galaxies to the largest galaxy clusters, from the cosmic microwave background to the cosmic web that traces the Universe s structure — we can see the imprints and effects of its presence. For every proton s mass worth of normal matter, there s five times as much dark matter, out-massing and out-gravitating the conventional stuff that makes up everything we ve ever directly detected.





Even though we have yet to directly detect it, and even though we aren t sure exactly what its true properties are, dark matter holds a tremendous promise for the future of humanity. Ubiquitously located all throughout the galaxy and far beyond, dark matter could be the perfect fuel that makes our interstellar dreams come true. Here s the story of how.





A logarithmic chart of distances, showing the Voyager spacecraft, our Solar System and our nearest star, for comparison. If we ever hope to travel across the great interstellar distances, it will require a technology that s superior to chemical-based rockets, and hopefully that will include the discovery of a fuel that can be replenished as we traverse our path through the galaxy.





NASA JPL-Caltech





Whenever humanity sets our sights on exploring the depths of space, there are constraints we can t avoid: the laws of physics. In order to accelerate a spacecraft — or any mass — you have to impart an impulse to it in order to change its momentum. The larger the impulse, the more you can change an object s speed. All that determines the magnitude of an impulse is how much force you apply and how long you apply it for.





In a conventional rocket, that impulse is provided by rocket fuel that undergoes a combustion reaction, which produces impulse in the form of thrust. Although this is the best method humanity has come up with for space travel so far, it s incredibly limiting. All of our past and current rockets are chemical-based, unfortunately, and that places tremendous constraints on how far we ve been able to go.





This engine test shows the firing of SpaceX s Raptor engine, which relies on an extremely powerful and fuel-efficient reaction. Unfortunately, it s still a chemical-based reaction, and converts only about one-millionth of the fuel s mass into energy. We will have to do better if we want to achieve our interstellar dreams on timescales of a human lifetime.





SpaceX Elon Musk





The reason for this is simple: in order to produce thrust — i.e., in order to impart an impulse to your spacecraft — you have to convert that stored chemical energy in the fuel into kinetic energy that pushes your spacecraft. In order to generate that energy, however, you have to use up some of that fuel you re carrying with you.





The key to getting lots of thrust, and therefore lots of acceleration, is fuel efficiency. Certain types of fuel are more energy-efficient than others, meaning that we can get more energy and thrust, and acceleration out of, say, kilogram of some types of fuel. An easy way to think about this is through Einstein s most famous equation: E = mc. If you had a perfect, ideal fuel, it would convert % of your fuel s mass into energy, enabling you to make the most efficient fuel imaginable.





The launch of Cassini, on October , . This spectacular streak shot was taken from Hangar AF on Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, with a solid rocket booster retrieval ship in the foreground. For all of our history on Earth, the only way we ve ever reached space is through the use of chemical-based fuels.





NASA





At most, though, chemical-based reactions are somewhere around .% efficient. The reason is as follows: chemical reactions rely on electron transitions between atoms and molecules. Most of an atom s mass is in the form of protons and neutrons, each of which have a mass that contains around eV worth of energy. Electron transitions, however, are on the order of a few typically - eV of energy. Even with all the chemical-based tricks we can perform, there are no known reactions that allow us to improve on this.





Sure, we can go for some type of nuclear fuel, but that s only marginally better, achieving efficiencies of around .%. It s a huge improvement, if we can realize it, but there s still a fundamental problem with accelerating to speeds that will carry you interstellar distances on reasonable timescales.





The Tsiolkovsky rocket equation is required to describe how fast a spacecraft that burns through a portion of its fuel to create thrust can wind up traveling through the Universe. Having to bring your own fuel on board is a severely limiting factor as far as the speed at which we are capable of traveling through intergalactic space.





Skorkmaz at English Wikipedia





The key problem is as follows: whenever you burn fuel, you have to accelerate the entire mass of your spacecraft, including any fuel that s still on board.





Read that again: including any fuel that s still on board.





In other words, let s imagine you can shoot exhaust out of your vehicle at an incredible rate: , mph about , kph, relative to the rocket itself. If you start off with a rocket where % of your initial mass is fuel, and you assume that your fuel is perfectly % efficient as though it were pure matter-antimatter annihilation, you d wind up with a final speed of , mph , kph. Even at this record-setting rate, it would still take thousands of years to reach the nearest star.





All rockets ever envisioned require some type of fuel, but if a dark matter engine were created, new fuel is always to be found simply by traveling through the galaxy. Because dark matter doesn t interact with normal matter mostly but passes right through it, you wouldn t have any difficulty collecting it in a specific volume of space; it would always be there as you moved through the galaxy.





NASAMSFC





On the other hand, there s another approach to interstellar travel that could — in principle — make our science-fiction dreams come true. Instead of bringing your fuel with you, what if you collected it as you went? Typically, ideas like this involve enormous magnetic fields that funnel charged particles into some sort of trap in your spaceship, allowing you to put nuclei and electrons together where you can then extract energy and perform further reactions with them.





But dark matter offers a tremendous advantage over normal matter in this regard. Why? Because you don t have to do anything special to collect it. It s literally everywhere, distributed in an enormous halo surrounding and encompassing every large galaxy we know of, including the Milky Way. If we find ourselves anywhere in the galaxy, there s bound to be dark matter lying around.





While stars might cluster in the disk and the normal matter might be restricted to a nearby region around the stars, dark matter extends in a halo more than times the extent of the luminous portion. It is truly found everywhere humanity has dreamed of traveling in our own galaxy, and in many places beyond.





ESOL. Calçada





The second tremendous advantage comes from the progression away from chemical-based rockets and towards the idea of a perfect fuel. For chemical-based rockets, .% energy efficiency is the best we can hope for. For nuclear-based rockets, fission power might get us up to .% efficiency, and nuclear fusion might get us a little further: perhaps up to .%.





The ideal configuration would be to use matter-antimatter annihilation, which is % energy efficient. The downside of matter-antimatter annihilation comes with a terrible cost, though: it takes a tremendous amount of work, energy, and effort to create an extraordinarily small amount of antimatter. If you took all the particle physics laboratories ever constructed on Earth and added up all the antimatter humanity has ever created, from Fermilab to CERN, you d wind up with less than a microgram of antimatter.





A portion of the antimatter factory at CERN, where charged antimatter particles are brought together and can form either positive ions, neutral atoms, or negative ions, depending on the number of positrons that bind with an antiproton. If we can successfully capture and store antimatter, it would represent a % efficient fuel source, but many tons of antimatter, as opposed to the tiny fractions of a gram we ve created, would be required for an interstellar journey.





E. Siegel





Sure, E = mc might be the most efficient way to extract energy from mass in the entire Universe, as it represents perfect efficiency. But even if you manage to contain and store your antimatter successfully and annihilate it only at the proper moment, you ll still have a finite supply of fuel that required an incredible amount of energy to collect. Once you use up this perfect fuel, you re all out, and all you can do is travel at a constant velocity through space for an indefinite duration of time. Even if we could generate an arbitrary amount, we d still be fundamentally limited with an antimatter rocket.





That s why the promise of a dark matter fuel source is so alluring. Not only might dark matter be an unlimited fuel source in terms of abundance that we don t have to carry on board with us, but it might have that perfect, % efficient matter-to-energy conversion potential we so strongly desire.





Our galaxy is thought to be embedded in an enormous, diffuse dark matter halo, indicating that there must be dark matter flowing through the solar system. Although we have yet to detect dark matter directly, its abundant presence throughout our galaxy and beyond might provide a perfect recipe for the perfect rocket fuel imaginable.





Robert Caldwell & Marc Kamionkowski Nature , -





There are a multitude of experiments looking for the collisions of dark matter with both normal matter and itself. In general, there are two types of particles in the Universe: fermions with half-integer spins and bosons with integer spins. If dark matter is a bosonic particle with no electric, color, or weak charge, that would mean it behaves as its own antiparticle.





If you can collect two dark matter particles and make them interact with one another, there s a finite probability that they ll annihilate. When an annihilation occurs, they ll produce pure energy in a % efficient fashion: via Einstein s E = mc. In other words, if we understand dark matter correctly, there s a free, unlimited source of energy everywhere humanity dreams of going.





The XENON experiment located underground in the Italian LNGS laboratory. The detector is installed inside a large water shield; the building next to it accommodates its various auxiliary subsystems. If we can understand and measure the particle properties of dark matter, we may be able to create conditions that coax it into annihilating with itself, leading to the release of energy via Einstein s E=mc^, and the discovery of a perfect spacecraft fuel.





XENONT collaboration





Because dark matter is everywhere, we wouldn t even need to carry it with us as we traversed the Universe. As far as we understand it — and admittedly, we need to understand it a lot farther — dark matter could truly deliver our dream of the ultimate fuel. It s abundant all throughout our galaxy and beyond; it should have a non-zero annihilation cross-section with itself; and when it does annihilate, it should produce energy with % efficiency.





Perhaps, then, most of us have been thinking about experiments seeking to directly detect dark matter all wrong. Yes, we want to know what makes up the Universe, and what the physical properties of its various abundant components truly are. But there s a science-fiction dream that could come true if nature is kind to us: unlimited, free energy just waiting there for us to harness, no matter where in the galaxy we go.





Mastering dark matter is the endeavor that just might make it so.


COMMENTS

Name

Astrophysics,22,Cosmos,20,Quantum Physics,20,
ltr
item
physicsworld: How Dark Matter Could Take Us To The Stars
How Dark Matter Could Take Us To The Stars
physicsworld
https://physicsworldcoin.blogspot.com/2019/07/how-dark-matter-could-take-us-to-stars.html
https://physicsworldcoin.blogspot.com/
https://physicsworldcoin.blogspot.com/
https://physicsworldcoin.blogspot.com/2019/07/how-dark-matter-could-take-us-to-stars.html
true
2623613692173364755
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share to a social network STEP 2: Click the link on your social network Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy